There is a LAFCO in each county in California. Marin LAFCO is a seven-member Commission comprised of two city council members (chosen by the Council of Mayors), two county supervisor members (chosen by the Board of Supervisors), two special district members (chosen by Independent Special District election), and one public member (chosen by the members of the Commission). Marin LAFCO currently oversees 65 local government agencies divided between 11 cities and 54 special districts. LAFCO's oversight includes the following duties:
The Marin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) promotes and coordinates the efficient delivery of local governmental services and encourages the preservation of open space and agricultural lands.
Notice is hereby and voluntarily given by the Marin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) that on Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 7:00 P.M. in the City of San Rafael Council Chambers located at 1400 Fifth Avenue, San Rafael, California the agency will consider the following:
Countywide Municipal Service Review on Public Water Services: West Marin Agencies
The Commission has continued the public hearing to provide additional opportunity for review and comments on the agency profiles completed to date on the four West Marin agencies included in Countywide Municipal Service Review on Public Water Services. The four affected agencies are Muir Beach Community Services District, Stinson Beach County Water District, Bolinas Community Public Utility District, and Inverness Public Utility District. The profiles represent an independent assessment of each agency’s administrative and service capacities relative to current and projected demands and are intended to serve as the source documents in preparing written determinations on – among other items – service needs and/or deficiencies as required under State law as part of the municipal service review process.
Regular Meeting - April 9, 2015
Regular Meeting - June 11, 2015
Regular Meeting - August 13,, 2015
After World War II, California experienced dramatic growth in population and economic development. With this boom came a demand for housing, jobs, and public services. To accommodate this demand, the state approved the formation of many new local government agencies, often with little forethought as to the ultimate governance structures in a given region. The lack of coordination and adequate planning led to a multitude of overlapping, inefficient jurisdictional and service boundaries, and the premature conversion/loss of California’s agricultural and open-space lands.